This led to an invitation of representatives from Harvard Law School and Yale Law School who ultimately accepted the invitation and began to draft the first administration of the LSAT exam. NYUin correspondence by memorandum, was openly unconvinced "about the usefulness of an aptitude test as a method of selecting law school students", but was open to experimenting with the idea, as were other schools that were unconvinced.
D 2 and 3 only E 1, 2, and 3 Reading Comprehension Many, perhaps most, well-disposed, practical people would, if they had to designate a philosophy that comes closest to expressing their unstated principles, pick utilitarianism. The philosophy that proclaims as its sovereign criterion the procuring of the greatest good of the greatest number Lsat writing sample indeed served as a powerful engine of legal reform and rationalization.
And it is a crucial feature of utilitarianism that it is consequences that count. Now it is interesting that some judgments that are actually made in the law and elsewhere do not appear to accord with this thoroughgoing consequentialism. For instance, both in law and morals there are many instances of a distinction being made between direct and indirect intention — i.
So also the distinction is drawn between the consequences that we bring about by our actions and consequences that come about through our failures to act.
Also, when bad consequences ensue from our actions and what was done was in the exercise of a right or privilege, the law is less likely to lay those bad consequences at our doorstep. And, finally, if the only way to prevent some great harm would be by inflicting a lesser harm on yourself or on others, then too the law is inclined to absolve us of responsibility for that avoidable greater harm.
It is as if the net value of the consequences were not crucial, at least where net benefit is procured by the intentional infliction of harm. Not only are these distinctions drawn in some moral systems, but there are numerous places in the law where they are made regularly.
Since in utilitarianism and consequentialism in general the ultimate questions must always be whether and to what extent the valued end-state be it happiness or possession of true knowledge obtains at a particular moment, it is inevitable that the judgments on the human agencies that may affect this end-state must be wholly instrumental: Indeed it may well be that even the point and contents of normative judgments — whether legal or moral — are concerned not just with particular end-states of the world but also with how end-states are brought about.
These kinds of substantive judgments take the form: These are to be contrasted to judgments that this or that is an unfortunate, perhaps terrible, result that other things being equal one would want to avoid. The former are — very generally — judgments of right and wrong.
A law and utilitarianism are not always compatible.
B utilitarianism is the operating philosophy of most people. C consequentialism is the basis for legal reform. D direct and indirect intentions lead to different end-states. E judgments about human actions can be made only by the resulting end-states. Which of the following is NOT a feature of utilitarianism?
A Results are considered important. B Consequences are considered important.
C The valued end-state is considered important. D The means of achieving results are considered important. E The net value of consequences is considered important.Photo by Karatershel. Georgetown Law Snapshot. The law school was founded in , and is currently ranked in the top ten for “Trial Advocacy,” “Legal Writing,” and .
The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is a standardized test administered four times a year and can only be taken at designated testing centers. How is the LSAT scored? The LSAT is scored on a scale of The average score is about , but if you’re looking to get into one of the top 25 law schools, your score should be well over The LSAT Writing Sample (Essay Section) The last of the six test sections you'll encounter on the LSAT is a minute writing sample exercise designed to gauge the following.
Your ability to formulate a reasoned, persuasive argument; Your ability to compose an organized, coherent essay. Dec 02, · The writing sample is a minute writing exercise that is the sixth and final section of the LSAT, following the four scored sections and the experimental section.
To complete the writing sample. The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is a half-day standardized test administered 6 times each year at designated testing centers throughout the world. Administered by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) for prospective law school candidates, the LSAT is designed to assess reading comprehension, logical, and verbal reasoning proficiency.
The test is an integral part of the law school.